‘Trump’s List’: How Support Against Iran Is Dividing the Transatlantic Alliance

The relationship between the United States and NATO has returned to the center of global tensions. President Donald Trump is deeply frustrated with allies who failed to respond to U.S. requests during the conflict with Iran, leading to a strategic response that could permanently redefine the alliance’s dynamics.
A “Blacklist” Within NATO
According to information reported by the news outlet Politico, the White House is developing a ranking system for NATO member countries, based on two main criteria:
• Defense spending
• Level of support for the U.S. in the war against Iran
A diplomat described the model in symbolic terms:
“The White House has a list of good kids and another of naughty kids.”
The Trigger: Lack of Support in the War Against Iran
Trump’s dissatisfaction intensified following the so-called Operation Epic Fury, conducted by the Pentagon in the Middle East.
According to Washington’s assessment, many allies failed to meet requests for support, whether through direct participation, logistics, or granting access to military bases.
White House spokesperson Anna Kelly stated, according to Politico:
“The countries we protect with thousands of troops were not there for us.”
Who Supported and Who Resisted
Reports indicate a clear divide within the alliance:
Allies considered cooperative
• Poland
• Romania
• Baltic states (Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia)
• Germany (increasingly aligned)
These countries reportedly allowed the use of air bases and provided logistical support.
Allies that frustrated Washington
• Spain
• France
• United Kingdom
• Other Western European countries
According to sources, these governments resisted or delayed responses to U.S. requests, increasing Trump’s dissatisfaction.
Harsh Statements and Threats of Rupture
Trump made his frustration clear in a post on Truth Social:
“NATO wasn’t there when we needed it, and it won’t be there if we need it again.”
Additionally, he has already considered withdrawing the United States from the alliance, further heightening geopolitical uncertainty.
Tensions also grew after the U.S. president showed interest in taking control of Greenland — a territory of Denmark, a NATO member.
The Role of Pete Hegseth and the Idea of “Model Allies”
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had already signaled this line of thinking:
The concept of a “model ally” includes countries that meet military spending targets — especially the 5% goal advocated by Trump.
Possible Consequences for Poorly Rated Countries
The classification would not be merely symbolic. According to European officials, it could directly impact:
• Reduction of U.S. troops in certain countries
• Fewer joint military exercises
• Changes in arms sales and military cooperation
In practice, this could mean a complete reconfiguration of U.S. strategic priorities within NATO.
Mark Rutte’s Visit and a Decisive Moment
The initiative was reportedly prepared ahead of the visit of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte to Washington, which took place between April 7 and 12.
The meeting occurred at a critical moment, with officials assessing how each NATO country contributes to collective security.
Harsh Statements and Threats of Rupture
Trump made his frustration clear in a post on Truth Social:
“NATO wasn’t there when we needed it, and it won’t be there if we need it again.”
Additionally, he has already considered withdrawing the United States from the alliance, further heightening geopolitical uncertainty.
Tensions also grew after the U.S. president showed interest in taking control of Greenland — a territory of Denmark, a NATO member.
SOURCES:
- Anadolu Agency. “NATO wasn’t there when US needed it”: Trump. Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/nato-wasnt-there-when-us-needed-it-trump/3898859
- LIGA.net. Politico: White House has developed something of a list of “naughty and nice” NATO states. Available at: https://news.liga.net/en/world/news/politico-white-house-has-developed-something-of-a-list-of-naughty-and-nice-nato-states
- NATO – North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Secretary General visits Washington to discuss transatlantic security. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/news-and-events/articles/news/2026/04/10/secretary-general-visits-washington-to-discuss-transatlantic-security
- The Korea Times. Hegseth says special favor for “model allies” like S. Korea, consequences for those failing to do their part. Available at: https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/foreignaffairs/20251207/hegseth-says-special-favor-for-model-allies-like-s-korea-consequences-for-those-failing-to-do-their-part